COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF BLAST GEOMETRY EFFECTS ON FRAGMENTATION, PRODUCTION, AND BLASTING COST IN ANDESITE MINING AT PT. SULENCO WIBAWA PERKASA

https://doi.org/10.56139/intan.v9i1.385

Authors

  • Mansidi Program Studi Teknik Pertambangan, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Tanjungpura Pontianak
  • Syahrudin Program Studi Teknik Pertambangan, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Tanjungpura Pontianak
  • Murad Program Studi Teknik Pertambangan, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Tanjungpura Pontianak

Keywords:

Blasting cost, Rock fragmentation, Blast geometry, ICI-Explosives, Kuz-Ram

Abstract

Suboptimal blasting is often the primary cause of failing to achieve production targets and escalating operational costs in quarry mining. This study aims to provide recommendations for blasting geometry and optimal cost estimates to achieve <40 cm fragmentation of 85% and support the production target of 50,000 bcm/year at PT. Sulenco Wibawa Perkasa, West Kalimantan. The research employed a quantitative approach using a comparative method, comparing three blasting geometry designs (R.L. Ash, C.J. Konya, ICI-Explosives) against actual field geometries from five blasting events conducted during July–August 2024. Fragmentation predictions were performed using the Kuz-Ram model. The results showed that the actual geometry had a powder factor of 0.89 kg/m³, significantly above the normal range for andesite (0.4–0.6 kg/m³). The proposed ICI-Explosives Design 2 proved to be the most optimal, yielding fragmentation of 85.19% passing <40 cm (meeting the 85% target), a production volume of 2,488 bcm per blast (exceeding the 2,100 bcm target), and a powder factor of 0.54 kg/m³ (39% more efficient than the actual operation). The cost per bcm for this design was Rp38,080, representing a 38% reduction compared to the actual cost (Rp61,567/bcm). The study concludes with a recommendation for the ICI-Explosives Design 2 geometry comprising: 6 m borehole depth, 2.4 m burden, 2.4 m spacing, 0.6 m subdrilling, 5.4 m bench height, 1.6 m stemming, 4.4 m charge column length, and 80 blast holes per shot, at a cost of Rp94,740,215 per blast or Rp1,184,253 per blasthole

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

. Izdihar C. F., Syahrudin, dan Purwoko B., “Optimalisasi Biaya Peledakan Batu Granodiorit Di PT Gilgal Batu Alam Lestari Sungai Duri II Kecamatan Sungai Kunyit Kabupaten Mempawah,” J. PWK, Laut, Sipil, Tambang, hal. 1–7, 2018.

. Abimanyu D., Trides T., dan Sakhdillah, “Evaluasi Geometri Peledakan Terhadap Fragmentasi Batuan Dan Biaya Peledakan PT. Teguh Sinarabadi, Kabupaten Kutai Barat Provinsi Kalimantan Barat,” J. Teknol. Miner. FT UNMUL, vol. 6, no. 2, hal. 29–36, 2018.

. Assany F. dan Kopa R., “Kajian Teknis dan Ekonomis Peledakan di Pit 1 PT. Pebana Adi Sarana Kabupaten Lima Puluh Kota Sumatera Barat,” J. Bina Tambang, vol. 6, no. 1, hal. 218–228, 2021.

. Fauzy M., Widodo S., dan Jafar N., “Analisis Biaya Peledakan Pada Proses Pembongkaran Batugamping PT. Semen Bosowa Maros Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan,” J. Geomine, vol. 3, no. 1, hal. 143–147, 2015.

. Agnesty I., Purwoko B., dan Meilasari F., “Kajian Biaya Peledakan Pada Proses Pembongkaran Batuan Granit di PT Hansindo Mineral Persada,” JeLAST J. PWK, Laut, Sipil, Tambang, vol. 1, no. 1, hal. 1–12, 2018.

. Murad M., “Rancangan Geometri Peledakan Batuan Granodiorit PT. Gilgal Batu Alam Lestari Mempawah Kalimantan Barat,” J. Sains dan Teknol. J. Keilmuan dan Apl. Teknol. Ind., vol. 22, no. 2, hal. 388, 2022.

. Safarudin S., Purwanto P., dan Djamaluddin D., “Analisis Pengaruh Geometri Peledakan Terhadap Fragmentasi dan Digging Time Material Blasting,” J. Penelit. Enj., vol. 20, no. 2, hal. 54–62, 2016.

. Prasongko R. D. dan Pradani D. I., “Kajian Teknis Geometri Peledakan di Pit Cendana PT Kalimantan Prima Persada Jobsite Rantau,” J. Sumberd. Bumi Berkelanjutan, vol. 2, no. 1, hal. 28–37, 2023.

. Frampton S. M., Saptono S., Wiyono B., dan Nursanto E., “Perancangan Geometri Peledakan Berdasarkan Karakteristik Batuan dan Struktur Geologi Permukaan Hasil Pemetaan UAV pada Batuan Metamorf di Penambangan Emas Blasting Geometry Design Based on Rock Characteristics and Surface Geological Structure of UAV Mappi,” J. Teknol. Pertamb., vol. 11, hal. 14–21, 2025.

. Kambuno Y. A., “JGP (Jurnal Geologi Pertambangan) Pengaruh Geometri Peledakan Terhadap Penggunaan Bahan Peledak di Pit Merandai Energi Kabupaten Kutai Kartanegara,” J. Geol. Pertamb., vol. 27, no. 2, hal. 25–37, 2021.

. Bulog M. Z., Banunaek F. S., Ndolu R., T. Pertambangan, dan U. N. Cendana, “Evaluasi Desain Pola Peledakan Pada PT Antam Tbk . UBPE Pongkor Tambang Gudang Handak (Evaluation Of Blasting Pattern Design At PT Antam Tbk . UBPE Pongkor Tambang Gudang Handak),” J. Teknol. Miner. FT UNMUL, vol. 13, no. 02, hal. 19–24, 2025.

. UU, “Peraturan Menteri Keuangan republik Indonesia Nomor 72 Tahun 2023.” hal. 1–76, 2023.

Published

2026-05-30

How to Cite

Mansidi, Syahrudin, & Murad. (2026). COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF BLAST GEOMETRY EFFECTS ON FRAGMENTATION, PRODUCTION, AND BLASTING COST IN ANDESITE MINING AT PT. SULENCO WIBAWA PERKASA. INTAN Jurnal Penelitian Tambang, 9(1), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.56139/intan.v9i1.385

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.